Monday, October 31, 2016

The Woman\'s Right to Know Act

In 1992, the landed estate of Wisconsin passed the Womans business to Know interpret, requiring that physicians provide expectant women with information concerning abortion, the risks of abortion, fetal development, alternatives to abortion, and different information so that women decision making whether to cook an abortion sight make an informed decision. The arrange also requires that women receive a sonogram to see the growing fetus while the compensate provides the aforementioned information, and must then(prenominal) wait a across-the-board 24 hours before the abortion can be performed. This snatch sought to give a consultation that provides women with accurate and nice information regarding their abortion, including connections to adoption agencies, motherhood care centers, and medical aid benefits, but despite the intentions of the accomplishment to provide help for women, it has through more(prenominal) harm than adept in pr act asice. I render to debat e that the Womans Right to Know Act should be repealed because it intrudes on the mysterious relationship betwixt patients and doctors, harms women more than it helps them, and is overall unconstitutional.\nMany opponents of this act have argued that government limp in the abortion operation is wrong because it directly violates the article of belief of doctor-patient confidentiality that has been upheld for decades. The bill is a touch-and-go assault into the confidential and late personal relationship that exists between women and their doctors. Physicians must be thaw to treat their patients based on their own medical companionship and expertise and should not have their advice overridden by elected officials want to impose their own ideologic agenda on others. This intrusion into the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship is correspondent to that which the Supreme Court accepted in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, where the Court ruled that a womans choice to ha ve an abortion was protected as a private decision between her and her doctor (The Right t...

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.