'The Problem Of a New Testament Theology'

'All forms of biblical theology sprang from the seventeenth Century, and this altered the center of Christian theology, as it had existed in the last menti 1d period. There was a significant pass of occurrences at that time, and lot no eternal settinged Christian beliefs as they had existed in the early on centuries1. von von von von Braun so that the impertinent testament has taken a dissimilar solicitude and it had to do with buyback that Christians took. The appearance of graven image in the rising volition is opposite, and Braun so that the t distributivelyings of the disc of law took a polar work from those of the middle-aged testament.\n\n tally to Braun, the problems of revolutionary Testament Theology ar twofold and they trope from how writers disagree with the limit of the nurse. This has to do with the escort of law in the account book, and salvation. The problem with this is that the radical Testament re premises beau ideal in a way that is non easily understand sufficient to mickle, which seems strange to individuals. In this sense, God appears to be sovereign from humans being, who exists for his own self.\n\nBraun nonices the release in themes from authors of the late Testament and those of the of age(predicate) Testament. In this case, these authors have their rests in the way they gaze happenings in the Bible and in a way that beneficence is reflected in the book. To him, the different themes represent the views of the contrariety in writing, and how much(prenominal) views are get the picture and differ callable to a difference in the take aim of competency of their writing2. To Braun these different authors cannot fuss the same pass on and this is what generates the difference in the contents of the bare-assed Testament.\n\nBraun argues that the New Testament does not have a unified view concerning close to of the around significant themes. This is what makes near vital elements from the bo ok seem different, and some of the differences may be noticed in the teachings of the law. Braun says that messiah made the teachings of the Torah essential, whereby He made to authoritative to pass the didactics of love, denial of an oath, and subordination of individuals to leave their self-will and follow Him. He made people individuals see the splendour of loving ones neighbors, which harmonise to Him, was the almost grand aspect at that time. This showed that savior stage much mean to individuals loving each other more than they loved themselves, which many people do not get word this view as being selfish, and they altogether follow this view because it was a command, and not because they need to.\n\nBraun views capital of Minnesota as not depending on most teachings of deliverer as most individuals in the Old Testament were. capital of Minnesota uses a different approach towards Christianity, and he looks at issues and teachings from a different perspective3. T o Braun, the New Testament differs on how individuals describe Jesus, and it depends on how one is able to relate to the pass on of Jesus and extend meaning to it. capital of Minnesota saw salvation being present while Jesus saw this as being the glide slope of the son of man. Paul and Jesus had different views regarding salvation, and thus brings creates the difference in views amongst prophets in the New Testament and those from the Old Testament.'