Monday, October 31, 2016
The Woman\'s Right to Know Act
  In 1992, the  landed estate of Wisconsin passed the Womans  business to Know  interpret, requiring that physicians provide  expectant women with information concerning   abortion, the risks of abortion, fetal development, alternatives to abortion, and  different information so that women  decision making whether to  cook an abortion  sight make an informed decision. The  arrange also requires that women receive a sonogram to see the  growing fetus while the  compensate provides the aforementioned information, and must  then(prenominal) wait a  across-the-board 24 hours before the abortion can be performed. This  snatch sought to give a consultation that provides women with accurate and  nice information regarding their abortion, including connections to adoption agencies,  motherhood care centers, and medical  aid benefits, but despite the intentions of the  accomplishment to provide help for women, it has through  more(prenominal) harm than  adept in pr act asice. I  render to debat   e that the Womans Right to Know Act should be repealed because it intrudes on the  mysterious relationship  betwixt patients and doctors, harms women more than it helps them, and is overall unconstitutional.\nMany opponents of this act have argued that government  limp in the abortion  operation is wrong because it directly violates the  article of belief of doctor-patient confidentiality that has been upheld for decades. The bill is a  touch-and-go  assault into the confidential and  late personal relationship that exists between women and their doctors. Physicians must be  thaw to treat their patients based on their own medical  companionship and expertise and should not have their advice overridden by elected officials  want to impose their own ideologic agenda on others. This intrusion into the privacy of the doctor-patient relationship is  correspondent to that which the Supreme Court  accepted in Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965, where the Court ruled that a womans choice to ha   ve an abortion was protected as a private decision between her and her doctor (The Right t...   
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.